Human Adipose-Derived Pericytes: Biological Characterization and Reprogramming into Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

 

Toka A. Ahmeda    Wafaa G. Shoushab    Sara M. Abdob    Ihab K. Mohamedc    

Nagwa El-Badria

 

aCenter of Excellence for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, Zewail City of Science and Technology, Giza, Egypt, bDivision of Biochemistry, Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt, cFaculty of Science, Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

 

 

 

 

Key Words

PCs multipotent stem cells adipose tissue stem cells induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)

 

Abstract

Background/Aims: Pericytes (PCs) are multipotent vascular precursors that play a critical physiological role in the development and maintenance of blood vessel integrity. In this study, we aim to characterize PCs isolated from human abdominal adipose tissue and develop an integration-free induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) using episomal vectors. Methods: The ultrastructure of adipose tissue-derived PCs was determined using scanning and transmission electron microscopy. The expression of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and pericyte markers were examined using flow cytometry and PCR analysis. PCs were induced to adipogenic, osteogenic and myogenic lineages, and their angiogenic potential was determined using tube formation assay. We further established pericyte reprogramming protocol using episomal vectors. Results: Our data showed that human adipose tissue-derived PCs uniformly expressed MSCs, CD105 and CD73, and PCs markers, desmin, and alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), while lacked the expression of HLA-DR and the hematopoietic markers CD34, CD11b and CD45. Ultrastructure analysis showed typical internal structure for the PCs with a characteristic prominent eccentric nuclei and cytoplasmic invaginations forming a caveolar system. Functional analysis showed efficient differentiation into adipocytes, osteocytes, and myocyte-like cells. Adipose tissue-derived PCs showed angiogenic potential using tube-forming assay. To determine further application of these cells for personalized therapy, we reprogrammed PCs into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) using episomal vectors. Reprogrammed cells gradually lost their fusiform shape, acquired the epithelial cell morphology and formed colonies. Furthermore, reprogrammed cells successfully expressed the pluripotency markers OCT4, Nanog, SSEA-4, and β-catenin, an early reprogramming marker. Conclusion: The accessibility and abundance of human fat supports the application of adipose derived PCs as a novel and promising source of cell therapy and regenerative medicine.

 

 

Introduction

 

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are adult stem cells with self-renewal capacity and the potential to undergo multipotent differentiation into adipocytes, osteocytes and chondrocytes [1]. MSCs were first isolated in the sixties by Friedenstein et al. from rodent bone marrow as adherent fibroblastoid cells [2, 3]. The term “mesenchymal stem cells” was later coined by Caplan [4]. MSCs were later isolated from different tissues, such as adipose tissue [5], umbilical cord [6], umbilical cord blood [7], placenta [8], amniotic fluid [9], muscle [10], dental pulp [11], and tendons [12]. While MSCs from marrow and umbilical cord origin showed promise for clinical purposes [13-15], adipose tissue-derived MSCs are showing superior regenerative capacities in the pre-clinical setting [16]. General criteria for MSCs reported by the Tissue Stem Cell Committee of the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT) include the expression of CD105, CD73 and CD90 markers, and a lack of expression of the haematopoietic stem cells markers CD45, CD34, CD14, CD11b, CD79α, CD19, and HLA-DR. MSCs differentiate into chondrocytes, osteocytes and adipocytes in vitro and adhere to plastic [17]. MSCs have also been isolated from the vascular tissue in vascularized organs [18]. Perivascular cells, including pericytes (PCs) and adventitial cells (ACs), present with similar characteristics to MSCs, such as multipotent differentiation potential (adipogenic, chondrogenic, osteogenic and myogenic), surface expression of the CD73, CD90 and CD105 antigens, and a lack of expression of endothelial cell and hematopoietic surface markers (CD34, CD45, and CD31) [19, 20]. According to Crisan et al., PCs derive from a perivascular origin and are the in vivo counterparts of MSCs [18]. PCs are also called mural cells or Rouget cells by their discoverer Charles Rouget, who described them as non-pigmented adventitial cells in 1837 [21, 22]. In 1923, Zimmermann, a German anatomist, coined the term “pericytes[22, 23]. Most PCs originate from the mesoderm, but others are derived from the neural crest, such as the PCs in the brain and retina [24]. PCs also develop directly from endothelial cells (ECs) within the bone marrow [25, 26]. PCs were named after their function in wrapping the endothelial cell in microvessels and blood capillaries (peri: around, cyte: cell [18]). An analysis of pericyte morphology shows fibroblast-like cells with a distinct nucleus, small cytoplasmic content, and several long processes surrounding the endothelial wall [27, 28]. In addition to small capillaries, venules and arterioles, PCs have been isolated from the subendothelial region of large vessels [29, 30]. PCs to regulate the differentiation and proliferation of the endothelial cells [31, 32], and have important roles in maintaining the integrity and stability of blood vessels and in establishing and maintaining both angiogenesis and vasculogenesis [33]. In the present study, we isolated and characterized PCs from human adipose tissue and induced them to differentiate into cells of multiple lineages. We further reprogramed PCs into induced iPSCs using episomal vectors, without the need for viral integration. Reprogrammed PCs might thus prove to be a valuable tool in regenerative medicine as they are abundant and are easily obtained and isolated from various tissues.

 

 

Materials and Methods

 

Cell isolation and culture

Adipose tissue was collected as a byproduct from patients who underwent abdominal surgery at Al-Sheikh-Zayed Specialized Hospital after obtaining the informed consent and the approval of the Ethical Committee of the Hospital. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. The experimental design used to characterize the human adipose tissue-derived PCs and to generate an integration-free iPSCs using episomal vectors was illustrated in (Fig. 1). PCs were isolated from human adipose tissue using previously described methods [34], with minor modifications. Adipose tissues were dissected into small pieces and cultured on 0.1% collagen-coated 10 cm2 Petri dishes (Serva, Germany). After at least 3 hours of adhesion, pericyte culture media were added (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM)-mega-cell supplemented with 10% FBS (Sigma Aldrich, USA), 2 mM glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin amphotericin, 1% non-essential amino acids (Lonza, Switzerland), 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol (Serva, Germany) and 5 ng/ml basic fibroblast growth factor (Gibco, USA). After 2 weeks in culture, both floating and adherent cells were transferred to non-coated Petri dishes, which was considered passage one. Cells were trypsinized when they reached 70-80% confluence. Human adipose-derived PCs (up to passage 10) were imaged using an inverted microscope (Leica, DMI8, Germany).

 

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental design used in the current study.

 

Flow cytometry characterization

PCs were characterized using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACSCalibur, Becton Dickinson, USA). For surface markers staining, cells were blocked with 4% bovine serum albumin and stained with the following antibodies: FITC-conjugated CD34, PE-CD11b, APC-HLADR, FITC-CD73, Per-CP-CD105 and APC-CD45 (BD Biolegend, USA). For intracellular markers staining, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100, blocked with 4% BSA and then stained with anti-alpha smooth muscle actin (Abcam, UK), anti-desmin (Abcam, UK), anti-Oct4 (R&D Systems, USA), anti-Sox2 (R&D systems, USA) and anti-Nanog (Bioss Antibodies, USA) antibodies, followed by specific secondary antibodies to examine the expression of intracellular markers using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, USA) using standard procedures and were analyzed by CellQuest Pro software (Becton Dickinson, USA).

 

Conventional PCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted from PCs using the PureLink® RNA Mini Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The total RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNAs using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The amplification of alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and 𝛽-actin was carried out using the following primers: α-SMA sense, 5’-CCGACCGAATGCAGAAGGA-3’ and anti-sense, 3’-ACAGAGTATTTGCGCTCCGAA-5’; 𝛽-actin sense, 5’-AGAGCTACGAGCTGCCTGAC-3’ and anti-sense, 5’ AGCACTGTG TTGGCGTACAG-3’ (Invitrogen, USA), PCR product was loaded on gel and bands were visualized using a Chemi Doc imaging system.

 

Angiogenic tube formation assay

PCs diluted in supplemented medium 200 were cultured on Geltrex® LDEV-Free Reduced Growth Factor Basement Membrane Matrix -coated plates (Gibco, USA) at a density of 20,000 cells/cm2 (angiogenic starter kit, Gibco, USA). Cells were incubated overnight at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. Twelve hours after seeding, the cells were stained with 2 μg/ml of Calcein AM, then incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere for 30 minutes, and imaged at 5X magnification using phase contrast and florescence inverted microscopes (Leica, Germany).

 

In vitro adipogenic, osteogenic and myogenic differentiation

PCs were cultured in adipogenic differentiation medium consisting of DMEM (Lonza) supplemented with 10% FBS (Sigma), 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin amphotericin (Lonza, Switzerland), 0.5 mM isobutyl-methyl-xanthine, 1 μM dexamethasone (Serva, Germany), 10 μM insulin and 200 μM indomethacin (Acros Organics, USA) to induce differentiation into cells of the adipogenic lineage. Lipid droplets were visualized using Oil red O staining (Acros Organics, USA). PCs were cultured in osteogenic differentiation medium consisting of DMEM (Lonza) supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin amphotericin (Lonza), 0.1 μM dexamethasone (Serva, Germany), 50 μM L-ascorbic acid and 10 mM β-glycerophosphate (Sigma Aldrich, USA) to induce differentiation into cells of the osteogenic lineage. The extracellular calcified mineral matrix was visualized using Alizarin red staining (Alpha Chemika, India).

PCs were cultured in myogenic differentiation medium (DMEM)-mega-cell, supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin amphotericin, 1% non-essential amino acids (Lonza, Switzerland), 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol (Serva, Germany), 5 ng/ml basic fibroblast growth factor (Gibco, USA) and 10 µM 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-Aza) (Abcam, UK). After 24 hrs, the myogenic differentiation medium was removed; cells were washed twice with PBS to remove any remaining toxic azacytidine and were cultured for two weeks in normal pericyte culture medium. Cells were imaged at different times using an inverted microscope (Leica, Germany) until the end of the second week.

 

Confocal immunofluorescence imaging

PCs were cultured on coverslips for 24 hours, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100, and blocked with 4% BSA. Cells were then stained with anti-desmin and anti-alpha smooth muscle actin antibodies (Abcam), labeled with the appropriate secondary antibodies, and stained with Hoechst 33342. Cells were mounted using ProLong gold antifade mounting medium (Molecular Probes, USA) and imaged using a 60x objective with a Nikon A1R inverted laser scanning confocal microscope (Nikon Microsystems, France).

 

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging

PCs were rapidly fixed with 0.1 M cacodylate-buffered 2% glutaraldehyde for 2 hours at 4°C. Cells were then washed with equal volumes of 0.4% sucrose and 0.2% cacodylate for 2 hours before fixation with equal volumes of 0.2% cacodylate and 2% osmic acid for 1 hour. Afterwards, PCs were washed twice with distilled water. Dehydration was performed by incubating cells with an ascending series of ethyl alcohol for 5 min each; then, the cells were cleared with propylene oxide. Finally, PCs were embedded in epoxy resin. The polymerized resin blocks were cut into semithin sections (1 µm thick) with an ultramicrotome (American Optical Co., USA). These sections were then routinely stained with methylene blue and azure mix for examination under a light microscope. Ultrathin sections (60 nm thick) were obtained using a diamond knife and the same ultramicrotome, and then mounted on perforated copper grids (Electron Microscopy Science, Hatfield, USA). Finally, the ultrathin sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Examinations and imaging were performed using TEM (TEM, Philips EM 208S, Tokyo, Japan) at an 80 kV acceleration voltage.

 

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging

PCs were processed using the same procedure as described for TEM until dehydration with an ascending series of ethyl alcohol (30%, 50%, 70% and 90%) for 5 min each. Cells were then rinsed with absolute ethyl alcohol 3 times for 3 min each and were examined on the Formvar coating grids by an Environmental SEM (Inspect S50; FEI, Holland).

 

Induced reprogramming of PCs using an episomal plasmid vector

PCs were transfected as previously described [35]. Briefly, bacteria expressing plasmids carrying reprogramming factors, Addgene: 27077 (pCXLE-hOct3/4-shp53-F), 27078 (pCXLE-hSK), and 27080 (pCXLE-hUL), were thawed and incubated at 37°C in Luria broth media (LB media) overnight; the plasmids were then purified using the PureYield Plasmid Miniprep System (Promega). In total, 6x106cells were trypsinized, resuspended in 1 ml of optimum medium, and centrifuged at 400xg to remove any traces of the culture medium, which may affect cell viability during electroporation. Finally, cells were resuspended in 200 µl of optimum medium and elctroporated with 2 µg of purified plasmids in 0.4 cm Gene Pulser cuvettes (Bio-Rad) using a Gene Pulser electroporator (Bio-Rad). All transfection parameters were adjusted to a voltage of 400 V and a duration of 17 msec. After transfection, cells were incubated at room temperature for 2-3 minutes to allow them to recover from electroporation and then cultured in 20% FBS-supplemented pericyte culture medium on gelatin-coated six-well plates. Twenty-four hours after transfection, the culture medium of the transfected cells was changed and refreshed every other day. On day 5, some of the observed colonies were picked up under the stereomicroscope (Zeiss, stemi508, Germany) and cultured for 24 hours on a coverslip for immunofluorescence staining. Attached colonies were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100, blocked with 4% BSA and stained with anti-Oct4 (R&D Systems, USA), anti-Nanog (Bioss Antibodies, USA) and anti-β-catenin (Cell Signalling Technology, USA) antibodies, labeled with specific secondary antibodies, and imaged using a Leica inverted florescence microscope (Leica, DMI8, Germany). On day 13, transfected cells were stained with anti-SSEA-4 and data were acquired with a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, USA). After two weeks, transfected cells were cultured in mouse embryonic fibroblast-conditioned medium (DMEM F-12, Lonza) supplemented with 20% knock-out serum (Gibco, USA), 2 mM glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin amphotericin, 1% non-essential amino acids (Lonza), 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol and 5 ng/ml basic fibroblast growth factor.

 

 

Results

 

Generation of fibroblast-like cells from human adipose tissues

After 5 days of culture of human adipose tissue on collagen-coated Petri dishes, fibroblast-like cells began to be released. The floating cells were discarded, and the adherent cells were transferred to uncoated Petri dishes and passaged when they reached 70-80% confluence, for up to 10 passages. Adherent cells cultured in pericyte-specific medium showed a spindle-shaped fibroblast-like morphology with a prominent eccentric nucleus and cytoplasmic projections (Fig. 2A).

 

Fig. 2. Morphological, phenotypic and genotypic analyses of pericytes. A. Images of human adipose-derived pericytes at different passages captured using an inverted microscope: (A-C) p1-p6, and (D-F) p7-p10. B. Confocal microscope images showing the expression of alpha smooth muscle actin and desmin. B1. nuclear staining using Hoechst, B2. alpha smooth muscle actin expression, B3. desmin expression, and B4. merged image from B1-B3. C. Flow cytometry analysis of human adipose tissue-derived pericytes. (C1-C3) showing expression of the mesenchymal stem cells markers CD105 and CD73, but not HLA-DR, or the hematopoietic stem cells markers CD34, CD45 and CD11b. C4,5. Conventional PCR analysis showing the expression of alpha smooth muscle actin and CD146. D. Flow cytometry analysis of human adipose tissue-derived pericytes. (D1-D6) showing expression of the pericyte markers desmin and alpha smooth muscle actin and the pluripotency markers Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog.

 

Cells isolated from human adipose tissue express pericyte markers

Fibroblast-like cells isolated form human adipose tissue expressed common pericyte markers, as determined by intracellular staining and flow cytometry. Cells were positive for desmin and alpha smooth muscle actin as showed by confocal microscopy imaging and flow cytometry (Fig. 2B-D). Also, cells expressed CD73 and CD105 specific markers of MSCs, but not the hematopoietic markers CD34, HLADR, CD11b and CD45 (Fig. 2C). Furthermore, cells expressed the intracellular pluripotency markers Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog (Fig. 2D).

 

Differentiation of PCs into cells of adipogenic, myogenic and osteogenic lineages

The adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation potential of PCs was qualitatively determined on day 17 after induction. Differentiated PCs showed positive staining for Oil red O (adipocyte-specific staining) and Alizarin red (osteocyte-positive staining) (Fig. 3A and C). Myogenic potential was determined by treating PCs with azacytidine for 24 hrs. The cells started to elongate on day 5 of culture in normal pericyte culture medium, and developed into myocyte-like cells at day 14 (Fig. 3B).

 

Fig. 3. Inverted microscope images showing multipotent differentiation potential of pericytes. A. Images of the adipogenic differentiation of pericytes on day 17 A1. shows the formation of lipid droplets in response to adipogenic induction before staining, (A2 and 3) showing differentiated pericytes on day 17 after staining with Oil red O, A4. magnified image of A3, A5. control pericytes that were not subjected to adipogenic induction but were stained with Oil red O. B. Images showing the myogenic differentiation of pericytes using 5-azacytidine, (B1-B3) control pericytes that not subjected to myogenic induction; black arrows indicate elongated myoblast-like cells on days 7,13 and 14. C. Images showing the osteogenic differentiation of pericytes on day 17. C1. images of Alizarin red-stained control cells that were not induced to undergo osteogenic differentiation. C2. showing Alizarin red-stained cells after osteogenic induction. D. Angiogenic differentiation (tube formation assay) of pericytes captured using an inverted fluorescence microscope. D1. control cells stained with Calcein AM without angiogenic induction. D2. cells stained with Calcein AM after angiogenic induction.

 

Angiogenic potential of PCs, as determined by the tube formation assay

Based on the fundamental function of PCs in the formation of new vessels, we analyzed the angiogenic differentiation potential of PCs using an angiogenesis differentiation kit. Our data showed robust tube formation compared to control cells (Fig. 3D).

 

TEM and SEM imaging of PCs

An examination of the ultrathin sections by TEM showed elongated cell bodies with longitudinal cytoplasmic processes. The cell surface showed a characteristic caveolar system composed of plasma membrane invaginations near the cell membrane and clearly visible cytoplasmic organelles. These organelles included smooth and rough endoplasmic reticulum, the Golgi apparatus, and mitochondria, which were located around the nucleus of each pericyte. Many intermediate filaments had assembled in the cytoplasm, while dense granules were appeared. Large vesicles were observed within the cytoplasm and in close proximity to the cytoplasmic processes. The cells showed prominent nuclei with prominent chromatin filaments and distinct nucleoli (Fig. 4A-F). SEM imaging showed a pericyte topography with many cytoplasmic processes, for which the diameter ranged from 19.90 µm to 25.70 µm (Fig. 4G-I).

 

Fig. 4. Electron micrographs of pericytes showing intracellular organelles. A. Nucleus (N), nucleolus (n), cytoplasmic vesicles (CV). B. magnified image showing the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and dense granules (DG). C and D. Mitochondria (M) are located close to the nucleus; the red arrow shows a magnified mitochondrion with its transverse cristae. E. The cytoplasmic processes (CP) of pericytes form the caveolae system (CS). F. Golgi bodies (G) are located close to the nucleus. G-I. Images showing the pericyte topography. H. Magnification of the image shown in G, (CP), cytoplasmic processes. I. Image showing the pericyte diameter, X4000.

 

Transfected human adipose-derived PCs showed iPSC-like colonies

Human adipose-derived PCs were reprogrammed into iPSCs as shown by the morphology, formation of colonies, and expression of pluripotency markers. PCs were transfected with plasmid episomal vectors, without the need for viral integration, as described in the above-mentioned protocol. Five days after transfection, microscopic imaging showed that some cells began to lose the fusiform morphology, acquire epithelial cell morphology, and form colonies (Fig. 5). Colony formation became more pronounced and homogenous over time (Fig. 6). On day 5, colonies imaged using stereomicroscopy (Fig. 7A) showed expression of the pluripotency markers Oct4, Nanog and β-catenin (Fig. 7B). Reprogrammed cells also expressed SSEA-4, a pluripotency marker, when analyzed by flow cytometry on day 13 (Fig. 6C). Finally, the reprogramming efficiency was calculated to be 0.007% (number of colonies divided by number of starting cells after electroporation) [36, 37].

 

Fig. 5. Microscopic images of reprogrammed pericytes after transfection with episomal vectors using electroporation; black arrows show colonies of transfected cells on days 5-11.

Fig. 6. Microscopic images of reprogrammed pericytes after transfection with episomal vectors using electroporation; black arrows show colonies of transfected cells on days 12-20.

Fig. 7. Characterization of iPSC-like colonies. A. Stereo-microscope images of reprogrammed pericytes showing regular-shaped colonies with sharp boarders (days 5-20). B. Inverted florescence microscope images of pericyte-derived iPSC-like colonies attached to a cover slip after they were picked on day 5. B1. BF (bright field) image of an attached colony. B2. fluorescence image of the same colony showing the expression of b-catenin. B3. nuclear staining with Hoechst 33342. B4. An image of another attached colony. B5 and B6. florescence images of the same colony showing positive expression of the pluripotency markers Oct-4 and Nanog . B7. nuclear staining with Hoechst 33342. C. Flow cytometry analysis of iPSC colonies. C1, C2. Showing the expression of SSEA-4, a highly specific embryonic stem cell marker, before and after reprogramming into iPSCs.

 

 

Discussion

 

In this study, we have successfully isolated and characterized PCs from human adipose tissue. These cells displayed similar ultrastructure to PCs derived from other sources, displayed robust angiogenic potential, and could be induced into pluripotent stem cells using bacterial episomal vectors, and without viral integration.

Multipotent perivascular adherent cells (PCs) have been isolated from various tissues using different isolation procedures [18, 38]. Although specific markers of those cells were not identified in most of these reports, PCs from different tissues share the common characteristics we have described in this study. The cultured cells displayed the typical pericyte morphology and expressed surface markers similar to those reported in the literature [39, 40].

Adipose tissue-derived PCs expressed desmin and alpha smooth muscle actin, in addition to mesenchymal stem markers, and lacked hematopoietic and endothelial markers, confirming their pericyte phenotype. One of the most recognized physiological functions of PCs is the formation of new blood vessels to regulate blood flow [41]. They have been shown to enhance the survival and migration of endothelial cells [42-46], and their loss caused vessel destruction [47] and the rupture of capillaries at late gestation [48]. Furthermore, previous studies have reported that PCs ameliorate ischemia after being transplanted into a mouse model of severe hind limb ischemia [49, 50]. They were also found to improve the blood flow in mice during femoral artery ligation [51] indicating their promising therapeutic targets for vascular disorders [52]. Our data showed robust tube formation when adipose tissue-derived PCs were cultured in angiogenesis-inducing medium, further supporting their function in vasculogenesis. As PCs participate in angiogenesis during wound healing [53] and in tumor growth [54], they are also considered promising targets for vascular regeneration, or tumor suppression. It is important however to consider, when designing therapies, that their heterogeneity suggests that different pericyte subpopulations may have different functions, based on the tissue of origin and surface markers [52].

Adipose tissue-derived PCs have been shown to differentiate into adipocytes in situ as a result of thermal injury [55]. Thus, although disputed by some reports, PCs may be adipocyte progenitors [56]. The common phenotypic and molecular pathways shared between adipogenesis and vasculogenesis led to the hypothesis that vascular cells may indeed function as adipocyte progenitors [57, 58]. In our study, PCs differentiated into adipocytes under adipogenic differentiation conditions, suggesting multipotency or a propensity for adipogenic lineage. These data are consistent with findings from a previous study [59] reporting a correlation between fat production by vascular cells and atherosclerosis.

Important characteristics of PCs include myogenic differentiation and contribution to skeletal muscle formation [60]. After xenograft transplantation, PCs fused with myoblasts to form myotubes. Similarly, in cases of acute injury or muscle necrotic disease, such as muscular dystrophy, PCs helped regenerate muscles [61]. After muscle injury, a small population of transplanted PCs engrafted beneath the basal lamina of myofibres and express Pax7 [62]. PCs were thus reported to generate satellite cells, the bona fide muscle stem cells, leading to the proposal to use them for cell-based therapies to treat muscular dystrophies [63]. Our data support the multilineage differentiation potential of PCs into myocyte-like cells following azacytidine induction [64].

In this study we are analysing the surface and internal structure of human adipose tissue-derived PCs for the first time using scanning and transmission electron microscopy. The structure of PCs was studied in the sixties by Epling [65], who described cells with large nuclei compared to a small cytoplasmic content with dense patches of heterochromatin. Mitochondria were distributed close to the nucleus, and granular endoplasmic reticulum with frequent free ribosomes was also observed. A few years later, in 1968, Bruns and Palade confirmed these data and reported non-prominent Golgi saccules, multivesicular bodies and dense cytoplasmic particles, which were proposed to be glycogen [66]. According to our TEM and SEM data, adipose tissue-derived PCs have a similar morphology and ultrastructure to muscle, lung and heart-derived PCs from model animals, such as rats, mice, swine and cattle. Adipose-derived PCs exhibited cytoplasmic processes forming caveolae or plasmalemmal vesicles in the perinuclear region and in the roots of processes. Caveolae are plasma membrane invaginations that are abundant in all blood vessels lining endothelial cells and PCs [67, 68]. Caveolae can bud to form cytoplasmic vesicles, which have the ability to act as carriers for the transport of proteins such as albumin to the inside of the cell [68]. These cytoplasmic vesicles have a diameter of 650-750 Ĺ and a membrane similar to the plasmalemma. They are present as single units or are fused together to form short chains of a few vesicles. Each configuration may be completely located within the cytoplasm or continuous with the plasmalemma and open onto the cell surface [66].

In our study, caveolae of adipose tissue-derived PCs were not motile, consistent with earlier descriptions, and in line with their main functions of regulating microvascular permeability, discharging plasma “cargo” into the intracellular space and regulating pinocytosis. Caveolin-1 and vesicle-associated membrane proteins (VAMPs) were detected in PCs caveolae of human venules. VAMPs comprise a family of v-SNARES (SNAP-Receptors) which main role is to promote vesicle fusion with target membrane-bound compartments [69], such as lysosomes. The detection of VAMPs in pericyte caveolae thus suggests a role in vesicular containers that perform their function while remaining attached to the plasma membrane [70]. Future work aims to determine the role of VAMPs in the structure and function of adipose-derived PCs.

Previous studies have reported that cells which express high level of endogenous transcription factors could be highly useful in cell reprogramming [71]. Adipose-derived PCs were thus tested for the pluripotency marker expression. We determined that adipose-derived PCs express endogenous Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog. This finding was consistent with previous studies on adult adipose-derived stem cells [72, 73]. This expression of endogenous pluripotency markers is thought to be functional in pericyte reprogramming to iPSCs, and could enhance cellular reprogramming [71, 72].

After transfecting adipose tissue-derived PCs with Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc; morphological changes, high expression of pluripotency markers and colony formation all indicated successful reprogramming into iPSCs starting from day 5. It has been reported that starting with cells which have more pluripotent epigenomic profile compared to the terminally differentiated cells could ease the iPSCs generation [74]. This proposition was confirmed in our manuscript by the 0.007% reprogramming efficiency of PCs into iPSCs [36, 37]. The use of episomal vector transduction without using viral integration furthers the use of PCs in clinical applications [36]. Recent protocols using a variety of modulators to reprogram somatic cells into iPSCs showed high reprogramming efficiency [75-77]. For example, Kogut et al. showed that a combination of synthetic modified mRNAs encoding reprogramming factors and miRNA-367/302s could synergistically enhance the iPSCs generation from human primary fibroblasts with a reprogramming efficiency of up to 90.7% when started with neonatal fibroblasts [77]. Wang et al. have demonstrated that long-term hematopoietic stem cells have the potential to be reprogrammed into iPSCs with a reprogramming efficiency of ≈50 % using Sendai virus transduction method [78]. Reprogramming pericytes using synthetic molecules, and the safety of these protocols for clinical applications remain to be investigated.

Positive expression of β-catenin on day 5 provides an additional evidence for early-stage reprogramming, as reported by previous studies on the nuclear accumulation of β-catenin during the reprograming of mouse embryonic fibroblasts into iPSCs [79, 80]. Furthermore, it has been reported that β-catenin interacted with the reprograming factors of pluripotency; Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 which could enhance the endogenous expression of the pluripotency markers and activate the pluripotent network at the early stage of reprogramming [81]. Thus, β- catenin is critical for reprogramming but not for the maintenance of iPSCs identity [81, 82]. Reprogrammed cells in this study showed positive expression for Oct-4, Sox-2, nanog and SSEA-4. The expression of these markers, in addition to vimentin, was used by Liu et al. to reprogram peripheral blood using recombinant lentiviruses transfection with Sox2, OCT-4, Klf4 and c-Myc [83]. Zhang et al. also showed iPSCs generation from PBMCs by Yamanaka factors (KMOS) transfection using Sendai-virus transfection [83]. Because of its availability and low invasiveness, adipose tissue is considered a clinically valuable source of stem cells. Furthermore, the in-vitro isolation, characterization and handling of human adipose tissue-derived PCs is simple compared to other adult stem cells. For these reasons we propose the use of adipose tissue derived PCs as source for iPSCs generation. Reprogrammed PCs might be applied to drug screening, and to studies aiming to understand disease mechanisms, toxicology, and regenerative medicine.

 

 

Conclusion

 

Pericytes hold reliable promise in vascular regenerative therapies, due to their physiological contribution to angiogenesis and maintenance of the blood vessel integrity. They are relatively easy to access and isolate from adipose tissue with minimally invasive procedures. Their potential capacity to differentiate into cells of different lineages, in addition to cells of vascular tissue suggests a potentially valuable contribution to treating a diverse array of diseases, and especially in vascular regenerative medicine. Future experimental studies to investigate the pathways by which PCs contribute in the process of angiogenesis during the physiological and pathological conditions are required. Controlling these pathways either by enhancement or inhibition could present an important approach in the treatment of different diseases with based on the vessel pathology. Another area for further research is to define the best extracellular matrix to enhance the angiogenic potential of the PCs, when transplanted in patients which vascular disorders. Lastly, many questions on the different growth factors, cytokines and pathways which control homing of PCs in cell-based therapy remain to be investigated.

 

 

Acknowledgements

 

This project was funded by a grant from the Science and Technology Development Fund (STDF) project #5300, and the Academy of Scientific Research and Technology (ASRT), Ministry of Scientific Research, Egypt. We thank Al-Sheikh-Zayed Hospital for providing the adipose tissue samples.

 

Statement of Ethics

Adipose tissue was collected as a surgical byproduct Al-Sheikh-Zayed Specialized Hospital after obtaining the informed consent and the approval of the Ethics Committee of the Hospital.

 

Author contributions

Toka A. Ahmed: conceived the idea, designed the experiments, pericytes isolation and characterization, adipogenic and angiogenic differentiation, reprograming of pericytes into iPSCs and wrote the manuscript.

 

Wafaa G. Shousha: osteogenic differentiation and revised the manuscript.

 

Sara M. Abdo: myogenic differentiation and revised the manuscript.

 

Ihab K. Mohamed: electron microscopy imaging and revised the manuscript.

 

Nagwa El-Badri: conceived the idea, designed and supervised the experiments, wrote and revised the manuscript.

 

 

Disclosure Statement

 

The authors have confirmed that no conflict of interests exists.

 

 

References

 

1 Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, Moorman MA, Simonetti DW, Craig S, Marshak DR: Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 1999;284:143-147.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5411.143

 

2 Friedenstein AJ, Piatetzky S, II, Petrakova KV: Osteogenesis in transplants of bone marrow cells. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1966;16:381-390.

 

3 Friedenstein AJ, Chailakhjan RK, Lalykina KS: The development of fibroblast colonies in monolayer cultures of guinea-pig bone marrow and spleen cells. Cell Tissue Kinet 1970;3:393-403.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2184.1970.tb00347.x

 

4 Caplan AI: Mesenchymal stem cells. J Orthop Res 1991;9:641-650.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100090504

 

5 Zuk PA, Zhu M, Ashjian P, De Ugarte DA, Huang JI, Mizuno H, Alfonso ZC, Fraser JK, Benhaim P, Hedrick MH: Human adipose tissue is a source of multipotent stem cells. Mol Biol Cell 2002;13:4279-4295.
https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e02-02-0105

 

6 Rogers I, Casper RF: Umbilical cord blood stem cells. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2004;18:893-908.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.06.004

 

7 Kluth SM, Buchheiser A, Houben AP, Geyh S, Krenz T, Radke TF, Wiek C, Hanenberg H, Reinecke P, Wernet P, Kogler G: DLK-1 as a marker to distinguish unrestricted somatic stem cells and mesenchymal stromal cells in cord blood. Stem Cells Dev 2010;19:1471-1483.
https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2010.0070

 

8 Igura K, Zhang X, Takahashi K, Mitsuru A, Yamaguchi S, Takashi TA: Isolation and characterization of mesenchymal progenitor cells from chorionic villi of human placenta. Cytotherapy 2004;6:543-553.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14653240410005366-1

 

9 Tsai MS, Lee JL, Chang YJ, Hwang SM: Isolation of human multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from second-trimester amniotic fluid using a novel two-stage culture protocol. Hum Reprod 2004;19:1450-1456.
https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh279

 

10 Asakura A, Komaki M, Rudnicki M: Muscle satellite cells are multipotential stem cells that exhibit myogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic differentiation. Differentiation 2001;68:245-253.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-0436.2001.680412.x

 

11 Shi S, Gronthos S: Perivascular niche of postnatal mesenchymal stem cells in human bone marrow and dental pulp. J Bone Miner Res 2003;18:696-704.
https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.4.696

 

12 Salingcarnboriboon R, Yoshitake H, Tsuji K, Obinata M, Amagasa T, Nifuji A, Noda M: Establishment of tendon-derived cell lines exhibiting pluripotent mesenchymal stem cell-like property. Exp Cell Res 2003;287:289-300.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-4827(03)00107-1

 

13 Trounson A, Thakar RG, Lomax G, Gibbons D: Clinical trials for stem cell therapies. BMC Med 2011;9:52.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-52

 

14 Cahill RA, Jones OY, Klemperer M, Steele A, Mueller TO, el-Badri N, Chang Y, Good RA: Replacement of recipient stromal/mesenchymal cells after bone marrow transplantation using bone fragments and cultured osteoblast-like cells. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2004;10:709-717.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2004.06.001

 

15 El-Badri NS, Hakki A, Saporta S, Liang X, Madhusodanan S, Willing AE, Sanberg CD, Sanberg PR: Cord blood mesenchymal stem cells: Potential use in neurological disorders. Stem Cells Dev 2006;15:497-506.
https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2006.15.497

 

16 El-Badawy A, Amer M, Abdelbaset R, Sherif SN, Abo-Elela M, Ghallab YH, Abdelhamid H, Ismail Y, El-Badri N: Adipose Stem Cells Display Higher Regenerative Capacities and More Adaptable Electro-Kinetic Properties Compared to Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. Sci Rep 2016;6:37801.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37801

 

17 Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D, Deans R, Keating A, Prockop D, Horwitz E: Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 2006;8:315-317.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14653240600855905

 

18 Crisan M, Yap S, Casteilla L, Chen CW, Corselli M, Park TS, Andriolo G, Sun B, Zheng B, Zhang L, Norotte C, Teng PN, Traas J, Schugar R, Deasy BM, Badylak S, Buhring HJ, Giacobino JP, Lazzari L, Huard J, et al.: A perivascular origin for mesenchymal stem cells in multiple human organs. Cell Stem Cell 2008;3:301-313.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2008.07.003

 

19 Covas DT, Panepucci RA, Fontes AM, Silva WA Jr, Orellana MD, Freitas MC, Neder L, Santos AR, Peres LC, Jamur MC, Zago MA: Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells obtained from diverse human tissues share functional properties and gene-expression profile with CD146+ perivascular cells and fibroblasts. Exp Hematol 2008;36:642-654.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exphem.2007.12.015

 

20 Murray IR, West CC, Hardy WR, James AW, Park TS, Nguyen A, Tawonsawatruk T, Lazzari L, Soo C, Peault B: Natural history of mesenchymal stem cells, from vessel walls to culture vessels. Cell Mol Life Sci 2014;71:1353-1374.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-013-1462-6

 

21 Hirschi KK, D'Amore PA: Pericytes in the microvasculature. Cardiovasc Res 1996;32:687-698.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6363(96)00063-6

 

22 Crisan M, Corselli M, Chen WC, Peault B: Perivascular cells for regenerative medicine. J Cell Mol Med 2012;16:2851-2860.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2012.01617.x

 

23 Nees S, Weiss DR, Senftl A, Knott M, Forch S, Schnurr M, Weyrich P, Juchem G: Isolation, bulk cultivation, and characterization of coronary microvascular pericytes: the second most frequent myocardial cell type in vitro. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2012;302:H69-84.
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00359.2011

 

24 Mills SJ, Cowin AJ, Kaur P: Pericytes, mesenchymal stem cells and the wound healing process. Cells 2013;2:621-634.
https://doi.org/10.3390/cells2030621

 

25 Sims DE: Recent advances in pericyte biology--implications for health and disease. Can J Cardiol 1991;7:431-443.

 

26 Larson DM, Carson MP, Haudenschild CC: Junctional transfer of small molecules in cultured bovine brain microvascular endothelial cells and pericytes. Microvasc Res 1987;34:184-199.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-2862(87)90052-5

 

27 Sims DE: The pericyte--a review. Tissue Cell 1986;18:153-174.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-8166(86)90026-1

 

28 DeRuiter MC, Poelmann RE, VanMunsteren JC, Mironov V, Markwald RR, Gittenberger-de Groot AC: Embryonic endothelial cells transdifferentiate into mesenchymal cells expressing smooth muscle actins in vivo and in vitro. Circ Res 1997;80:444-451.
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.80.4.444

 

29 Andreeva ER, Pugach IM, Gordon D, Orekhov AN: Continuous subendothelial network formed by pericyte-like cells in human vascular bed. Tissue Cell 1998;30:127-135.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-8166(98)80014-1

 

30 Nees S, Weiss DR, Juchem G: Focus on cardiac pericytes. Pflugers Arch 2013;465:779-787.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-013-1240-1

 

31 Gerhardt H, Betsholtz C: Endothelial-pericyte interactions in angiogenesis. Cell Tissue Res 2003;314:15-23.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-003-0745-x

 

32 Bergers G, Song S: The role of pericytes in blood-vessel formation and maintenance. Neuro Oncol 2005;7:452-464.
https://doi.org/10.1215/S1152851705000232

 

33 Eilken HM, Diéguez-Hurtado R, Schmidt I, Nakayama M, Jeong H-W, Arf H, Adams S, Ferrara N, Adams RH: Pericytes regulate VEGF-induced endothelial sprouting through VEGFR1. Nat Commun 2017;8:1574.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01738-3

 

34 Pierantozzi E, Badin M, Vezzani B, Curina C, Randazzo D, Petraglia F, Rossi D, Sorrentino V: Human pericytes isolated from adipose tissue have better differentiation abilities than their mesenchymal stem cell counterparts. Cell Tissue Res 2015;361:769-778.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-015-2166-z

 

35 Okita K, Matsumura Y, Sato Y, Okada A, Morizane A, Okamoto S, Hong H, Nakagawa M, Tanabe K, Tezuka K, Shibata T, Kunisada T, Takahashi M, Takahashi J, Saji H, Yamanaka S: A more efficient method to generate integration-free human iPS cells. Nat Methods 2011;8:409-412.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1591

 

36 Okita K, Matsumura Y, Sato Y, Okada A, Morizane A, Okamoto S, Hong H, Nakagawa M, Tanabe K, Tezuka K: A more efficient method to generate integration-free human iPS cells. Nat Methods 2011;8:409.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1591

 

37 Esteban MA, Wang T, Qin B, Yang J, Qin D, Cai J, Li W, Weng Z, Chen J, Ni S: Vitamin C enhances the generation of mouse and human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2010;6:71-79.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2009.12.001

 

38 Dellavalle A, Sampaolesi M, Tonlorenzi R, Tagliafico E, Sacchetti B, Perani L, Innocenzi A, Galvez BG, Messina G, Morosetti R, Li S, Belicchi M, Peretti G, Chamberlain JS, Wright WE, Torrente Y, Ferrari S, Bianco P, Cossu G: Pericytes of human skeletal muscle are myogenic precursors distinct from satellite cells. Nat Cell Biol 2007;9:255-267.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1542

 

39 Diaz-Flores L, Gutierrez R, Madrid JF, Varela H, Valladares F, Acosta E, Martin-Vasallo P, Diaz-Flores L, Jr.: Pericytes. Morphofunction, interactions and pathology in a quiescent and activated mesenchymal cell niche. Histol Histopathol 2009;24:909-969.

 

40 Morikawa S, Baluk P, Kaidoh T, Haskell A, Jain RK, McDonald DM: Abnormalities in pericytes on blood vessels and endothelial sprouts in tumors. Am J Pathol 2002;160:985-1000.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64920-6

 

41 Amselgruber WM, Schafer M, Sinowatz F: Angiogenesis in the bovine corpus luteum: an immunocytochemical and ultrastructural study. Anat Histol Embryol 1999;28:157-166.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0264.1999.00195.x

 

42 Nehls V, Denzer K, Drenckhahn D: Pericyte involvement in capillary sprouting during angiogenesis in situ. Cell Tissue Res 1992;270:469-474.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00645048

 

43 Kale S, Hanai J, Chan B, Karihaloo A, Grotendorst G, Cantley L, Sukhatme VP: Microarray analysis of in vitro pericyte differentiation reveals an angiogenic program of gene expression. FASEB J 2005;19:270-271.
https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.04-1604fje

 

44 Darland DC, Massingham LJ, Smith SR, Piek E, Saint-Geniez M, D'Amore PA: Pericyte production of cell-associated VEGF is differentiation-dependent and is associated with endothelial survival. Dev Biol 2003;264:275-288.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.08.015

 

45 Virgintino D, Girolamo F, Errede M, Capobianco C, Robertson D, Stallcup WB, Perris R, Roncali L: An intimate interplay between precocious, migrating pericytes and endothelial cells governs human fetal brain angiogenesis. Angiogenesis 2007;10:35-45.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-006-9061-x

 

46 Ozerdem U, Stallcup WB: Early contribution of pericytes to angiogenic sprouting and tube formation. Angiogenesis 2003;6:241-249.
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AGEN.0000021401.58039.a9

 

47 Conway EM, Collen D, Carmeliet P: Molecular mechanisms of blood vessel growth. Cardiovasc Res 2001;49:507-521.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6363(00)00281-9

 

48 Lindahl P, Johansson BR, Leveen P, Betsholtz C: Pericyte loss and microaneurysm formation in PDGF-B-deficient mice. Science 1997;277:242-245.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5323.242

 

49 Dar A, Domev H, Ben-Yosef O, Tzukerman M, Zeevi-Levin N, Novak A, Germanguz I, Amit M, Itskovitz-Eldor J: Multipotent vasculogenic pericytes from human pluripotent stem cells promote recovery of murine ischemic limb. Circulation 2012;125:87-99.
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.048264

 

50 Cathery W, Faulkner A, Maselli D, Madeddu P: Concise review: the regenerative journey of pericytes toward clinical translation. Stem Cells 2018;36:1295-1310.
https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.2846

 

51 Birbrair A, Zhang T, Wang Z-M, Messi ML, Olson JD, Mintz A, Delbono O: Type-2 pericytes participate in normal and tumoral angiogenesis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2014;307:C25-38.
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00084.2014

 

52 Birbrair A, Zhang T, Wang Z-M, Messi ML, Mintz A, Delbono O: Pericytes at the intersection between tissue regeneration and pathology. Clin Sci (Lond) 2015;128:81-93.
https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20140278

 

53 Fischer C, Schneider M, Carmeliet P: Principles and therapeutic implications of angiogenesis, vasculogenesis and arteriogenesis. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2006:157-212.
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36028-X_6

 

54 Raza A, Franklin MJ, Dudek AZ: Pericytes and vessel maturation during tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. Am J Hematol 2010;85:593-598.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.21745

 

55 Richardson RL, Hausman GJ, Campion DR: Response of pericytes to thermal lesion in the inguinal fat pad of 10-day-old rats. Acta Anat (Basel) 1982;114:41-57.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000145577

 

56 Cinti S, Cigolini M, Bosello O, Bjorntorp P: A morphological study of the adipocyte precursor. J Submicrosc Cytol 1984;16:243-251.

 

57 Fukumura D, Ushiyama A, Duda DG, Xu L, Tam J, Krishna V, Chatterjee K, Garkavtsev I, Jain RK: Paracrine regulation of angiogenesis and adipocyte differentiation during in vivo adipogenesis. Circ Res 2003;93:e88-97.
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000099243.20096.FA

 

58 Rupnick MA, Panigrahy D, Zhang CY, Dallabrida SM, Lowell BB, Langer R, Folkman MJ: Adipose tissue mass can be regulated through the vasculature. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:10730-10735.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.162349799

 

59 Davies JD, Carpenter KL, Challis IR, Figg NL, McNair R, Proudfoot D, Weissberg PL, Shanahan CM: Adipocytic differentiation and liver x receptor pathways regulate the accumulation of triacylglycerols in human vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem 2005;280:3911-3919.
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M410075200

 

60 Birbrair A, Zhang T, Wang ZM, Messi ML, Mintz A, Delbono O: Pericytes: multitasking cells in the regeneration of injured, diseased, and aged skeletal muscle. Front Aging Neurosci 2014;6:245.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00245

 

61 Bergwerff M, Verberne ME, DeRuiter MC, Poelmann RE, Gittenberger-de Groot AC: Neural crest cell contribution to the developing circulatory system: implications for vascular morphology? Circ Res 1998;82:221-231.
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.82.2.221

 

62 Dellavalle A, Maroli G, Covarello D, Azzoni E, Innocenzi A, Perani L, Antonini S, Sambasivan R, Brunelli S, Tajbakhsh S, Cossu G: Pericytes resident in postnatal skeletal muscle differentiate into muscle fibres and generate satellite cells. Nat Commun 2011;2:499.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1508

 

63 Meng J, Muntoni F, Morgan JE: Stem cells to treat muscular dystrophies - where are we? Neuromuscul Disord 2011;21:4-12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmd.2010.10.004

 

64 Okamura LH, Cordero P, Palomino J, Parraguez VH, Torres CG, Peralta OA: Myogenic Differentiation Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Fetal Bovine Bone Marrow. Anim Biotechnol 2017:1-11.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2016.1276926

 

65 Epling GP: Electron microscopic observations of pericytes of small blood vessels in the lungs and hearts of normal cattle and swine. Anat Rec 1966;155:513-529.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091550404

 

66 Bruns RR, Palade GE: Studies on blood capillaries. I. General organization of blood capillaries in muscle. J Cell Biol 1968;37:244-276.
https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.37.2.244

 

67 Frokjaer-Jensen J: The plasmalemmal vesicular system in striated muscle capillaries and in pericytes. Tissue Cell 1984;16:31-42.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-8166(84)90016-8

 

68 Wang Z, Tiruppathi C, Minshall RD, Malik AB: Size and dynamics of caveolae studied using nanoparticles in living endothelial cells. ACS Nano 2009;3:4110-4116.
https://doi.org/10.1021/nn9012274

 

69 Hu C, Ahmed M, Melia TJ, Sollner TH, Mayer T, Rothman JE: Fusion of cells by flipped SNAREs. Science 2003;300:1745-1749.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1084909

 

70 Virgintino D, Robertson D, Errede M, Benagiano V, Tauer U, Roncali L, Bertossi M: Expression of caveolin-1 in human brain microvessels. Neuroscience 2002;115:145-152.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4522(02)00374-3

 

71 Eminli S, Utikal J, Arnold K, Jaenisch R, Hochedlinger K: Reprogramming of neural progenitor cells into induced pluripotent stem cells in the absence of exogenous Sox2 expression. Stem Cells 2008;26:2467-2474.
https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2008-0317

 

72 Chen MJ, Lu Y, Hamazaki T, Tsai HY, Erger K, Conlon T, Elshikha AS, Li H, Srivastava A, Yao C: Reprogramming adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells into pluripotent stem cells by a mutant adeno-associated viral vector. Hum Gene Ther Methods 2013;25:72-82.
https://doi.org/10.1089/hgtb.2013.011

 

73 Zhu Y, Liu T, Song K, Fan X, Ma X, Cui Z: Adipose‐derived stem cell: a better stem cell than BMSC. Cell Biochem Funct 2008;26:664-675.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cbf.1488

 

74 Qu X, Liu T, Song K, Li X, Ge D: Induced pluripotent stem cells generated from human adipose-derived stem cells using a non-viral polycistronic plasmid in feeder-free conditions. PLoS One 2012;7:e48161.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048161

 

75 Vosough M, Ravaioli F, Zabulica M, Capri M, Garagnani P, Franceschi C, Piccand J, Kraus MR-C, Kannisto K, Gramignoli R: Applying hydrodynamic pressure to efficiently generate induced pluripotent stem cells via reprogramming of centenarian skin fibroblasts. PloS One 2019;14:e0215490.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215490

 

76 Mackey LC, Annab LA, Yang J, Rao B, Kissling GE, Schurman SH, Dixon D, Archer TK: Epigenetic Enzymes, Age, and Ancestry Regulate the Efficiency of Human iPSC Reprogramming. Stem Cells 2018;36:1697-1708.
https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.2899

 

77 Kogut I, McCarthy SM, Pavlova M, Astling DP, Chen X, Jakimenko A, Jones KL, Getahun A, Cambier JC, Pasmooij AM: High-efficiency RNA-based reprogramming of human primary fibroblasts. Nat Commun 2018;9:745.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03190-3

 

78 Wang K, Guzman AK, Yan Z, Zhang S, Hu MY, Hamaneh MB, Yu YK, Tolu S, Zhang J, Kanavy HE: Ultra-high-frequency reprogramming of individual long-term hematopoietic stem cells yields low somatic variant induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Rep 2019;26:2580-2592.e7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.02.021

 

79 Kimura M, Nakajima-Koyama M, Lee J, Nishida E: Transient Expression of WNT2 Promotes Somatic Cell Reprogramming by Inducing beta-Catenin Nuclear Accumulation. Stem Cell Reports 2016;6:834-843.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.04.012

 

80 Zhang P, Chang WH, Fong B, Gao F, Liu C, Al Alam D, Bellusci S, Lu W: Regulation of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell induction by Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. J Biol Chem 2014;289:9221-9232.
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.542845

 

81 Kelly KF, Ng DY, Jayakumaran G, Wood GA, Koide H, Doble BW: β-catenin enhances Oct-4 activity and reinforces pluripotency through a TCF-independent mechanism. Cell Stem Cell 2011;8:214-227.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2010.12.010

 

82 Marson A, Foreman R, Chevalier B, Bilodeau S, Kahn M, Young RA, Jaenisch R: Wnt signaling promotes reprogramming of somatic cells to pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 2008;3:132.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2008.06.019

 

83 Liu Q, Du J, Fan J, Li W, Guo W, Feng H, Lin J: Generation and characterization of induced pluripotents. stem cells from mononuclear cells in schizophrenic patients. Cell J 2019;21:161-168.